Powell, WY


Humidity: 32%

Wind: 25 mph

Oil firm sues for ranch access

A Texas-based oil and gas company is asking a judge to let it build a road, gas pipeline and power lines across a historic Meeteetse ranch.

Principle Petroleum Partners says the Pitchfork Ranch has refused to let the company construct infrastructure on the ranch that it needs to reach and develop oil and gas leases beyond. The suit says the Pitchfork and The Nature Conservancy, which holds a conservation easement on that part of the ranch, have rejected the oil and gas developer’s offers and alternatives to date.

According to the complaint, one of the co-owners of the Pitchfork Ranch, Dr. Lenox Baker, told Principle Petroleum after an initial meeting in March that “this ain’t gonna happen.”

“I just wanted to let you know ahead of time so that you don’t waste a lot of time and any more money on it,” Baker said, according to a transcript of a voicemail submitted with the company’s suit. “But we don’t want this to happen and we’ll go to every length we can to not let it happen.”

Principle Petroleum Partners is seeking to develop state lands it has leased about 17 west miles of Meeteetse. The area is surrounded by the Pitchfork Ranch land on three sides and blocked by Carter Mountain to the west, the complaint says.

The access across the Pitchfork is needed “because otherwise the Principle state leases will be rendered inaccessible and useless to Principle, and the state of Wyoming will not enjoy the benefit of having its lessee conduct oil and gas exploration and production on public lands,” the document says. The complaint was filed Sept. 6 in Park County’s District Court by Principle Petroleum attorneys Nicholas Haderlie and Jacob Haseman of the Throne Law Office in Sheridan.

Principle Petroleum is specifically seeking court approval to build 330 feet of new road and extend existing power and gas lines by roughly a half-mile each on the Pitchfork Ranch. The company is offering $14,634 for the ranch property it would take.

Wyoming law allows oil and gas companies to use eminent domain to get easements necessary for the construction, maintenance or operation of their facilities, though the project must be planned to bring the greatest public good and the least private injury.

The Pitchfork Ranch’s other co-owner, Greg Luce, said in a July 17 letter attached to the complaint that Principle Petroleum Partners was showing arrogance in asserting the oil and gas leases were superior to all other concerns.

“Perhaps that is how your clients are used to things in Texas, but that is not how it works in Wyoming, and not how it works on the Pitchfork Ranch,” Luce wrote to Principle attorney Haderlie.

Luce, himself an attorney with the Washington, D.C., office of the Skadden law firm, expressed many concerns, including that Principle Petroleum hadn’t provided enough information about itself, that the wells are unlikely to succeed and that the project could impact ground water, wintering elk, black-footed ferret reintroduction efforts, Yellowstone Cutthroat trout and other wildlife.

The Nature Conservancy echoed many of those concerns in a July 19 letter.

“The issue presented is whether engaging in conduct that has a known detrimental impact on land and animal conservation in the hope that previously unsuccessful attempts to use the state’s natural resources will not prove successful outweighs the conservation interest,” wrote attorney Katherine Ritchey of the firm Jones Day in San Francisco.

“We believe, and (The Nature Conservancy’s) conservation easement supports, that the greatest public good in this situation is the continued preservation of Wyoming’s land and important wildlife habitat.”

The conservation easement prohibits the construction Principle Petroleum is proposing, but Wyoming law says those easements can be overridden by eminent domain.

Luce suggested Principle attend a meeting with state and federal agencies “to consider the risks posed by your proposed project, work from a common understanding of boundary lines, and secure more specific information about your company and its intended operation.”

Haderlie, Principle’s attorney, responded in August that the company has been in contact with the agencies, who haven’t raised objections. He said the suggestion the agencies could impose new requirements to address the Pitchfork’s concerns “amounts to a collateral attack on the leases, yet Pitchfork Ranch was silent in 2009 and 2011 when the leases were issued.”

Principle Petroleum officials said they’ve tried to address the ranch’s concerns, including offering to fund conservation or habitat improvement projects or to add more wildlife stipulations, proposing alternate routes and inviting suggestions.

Principle President Daniel Dobson said in an affidavit that Pitchfork representatives, among other issues, “voiced non-specific concerns related to horizontal wells and hydraulic fracturing and gave movie references as the basis for those concerns” at an initial meeting in March. Dobson said he and Daryl LeFevre — a Cody petroleum engineer who’s a member of Principle Petroleum — explained the project involved vertical wells that generally don’t involve fracking.

Principle Vice President Scott Gladden said in one letter that at least 17 oil wells have been drilled since 2007 on state lands around the Pitchfork Ranch and none have had the impacts Pitchfork representatives fear. The project will re-develop an area that had oil and gas activity from 1957 to 1961 and from 1981 to 1991, Haderlie said, adding that the project will comply with Wyoming regulations.

The Nature Conservancy and the Pitchfork Ranch will next file a response to the complaint, which requests a hearing within 15 days of the entities being served with the document.

The Pitchfork Ranch was founded in 1878. Now encompassing more than 100,000 acres, it continues as a working cattle ranch and occupies “one of the few remaining unbroken valleys in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem,” according to the ranch website.

Principle Petroleum Partners was created earlier this year by a Houston private equity fund, though its members have oil and gas industry experience with other companies.


  • posted by Robert Johnson

    February 12, 2014 8:10 pm

    I live in wv and the gas company's and the state are one and the same.The politicians are owned by the gas company's and they are are taking any and all land they want paying what damages they want witch is much less than it is worth.I have received letters from the state DEP mailed by and filled out by the gas company giving them permission to drill test holes on my farm where they want not paying damages when they want.

  • posted by Alyssa pease

    September 26, 2013 8:09 am

    This is insane!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • posted by Sam

    September 22, 2013 9:47 am

    How many jobs? How much revenue will be gained from this new drilling? What will be the trade? What environmental impacts will be felt? Is it a fair trade? Will it create revenue for Park County or greater revenue for a Texas Based group of oil barons? These are the questions that should be answered before you form an opinion. I could venture a guess that just the road to the drill site alone will have a significant impact on the environment. $15000 seems a pittance fee to the land owners, when the impact will be felt for years. It is sad that we wish to remain ignorant to the facts as long as we make a dollar. what else are you willing to trade to make a buck?

  • posted by TwoBulls

    September 19, 2013 8:13 am

    I have hauled gravel to most of the operating well sites in that area, and when it comes time to calve, the cow Elk come into the batteries and tanks to give birth, so the damn wolves will leave them alone! The wildlife could care less about the development of a oilfield,and we sure could use the jobs!

  • posted by william k wilson

    September 18, 2013 8:53 am

    What is a little more road and pipe line and powerline as there are oil wells all over the place anyways. And as if the pitchfork aint changed the area anyways. Shame on you rich people.

  • posted by Disgusted taxpayer

    September 18, 2013 7:36 am

    CC,it still does not erase the fact that over half of Park County's revenue comes from oil & gas revenues,the very revenues that even you enjoy no doubt.As for the history lesson,I could care less what Franc or Phelps did as it's water under the bridge.Also I welcome an oil well in my driveway,I could use the dough to buy more ketchup.Enjoy the day on your bicycle since I know you don't use any fossil fuels or plastic products.

  • posted by Dix

    September 17, 2013 9:47 pm

    All bow as the exalted Dew has graced us with all knowing wisdom. Once again, it's the world according to Dewey.

  • posted by Dewey

    September 17, 2013 10:20 am

    One thing is still evident from the Old Days here in Wyoming...oil companies are still Robber Barons through and through.

    I hope Big Oil drills a well in Disgusted Taxpayer's driveway or front lawn , because he obviously thinks they can do anything they want whereever they please at any time. That Eminent Domain is just a blunt instrument that the state and corporations can employ. ( Then he finds out he doesn't have the subsurface mineral rights...)

    By the way , DT , the mighty Pitchfork was founded by another ' ding dong transplant' , a Cattle Baron named Otto Franc of Lichtensteion who made his fortune peddling Central American bananas. Otto actually wasn't a Baron , just a Count. When he died in 1903 , a ding dong tranplant banker from Minnesota named Louis G. Phelps bought the place and bought up every other ranch around it. Eating your own ill informed words will probably taste better if you use a lot of ketchup

  • posted by Disgusted taxpayer

    September 17, 2013 9:20 am

    The transplant city slickers who are buying up ranches and land in record numbers are infested with the greeny idea that oil comes from a can and gas comes from a hose.They have no concept of what it takes to furnish these products,yet they enjoy driving their monster SUV's and all the plastic junk that people buy now days,which is made of petroleum.Furthermore these ding dong transplants are restricting revenues that Park County will need,but then maybe they like paying higher taxes for services.

Leave a comment

All comments are initially screened to avoid spam and profanity, and your comment may take some time to appear on the site. The Powell Tribune reserves the right to not publish inappropriate comments.
Fields marked (*) are required.


Get all the latest Powell news by subscribing to the Powell Tribune today!

Click here to find out more!


Our paper can be delivered right to your e-mail inbox with a subscription to the Powell Tribune!

Find out more here!

Stay Connected

Keep up with Powell news by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.

Go to top