Powell, WY


Humidity: 10%

Wind: 11 mph

Firearm suppressor bill won’t be silenced

Suppressors may muffle the blast, but the desire by some to allow hunters or others to attach silencers to their guns was heard loud and clear in Cheyenne last week.

A similar bill to allow silencers or suppressors died in the House last month, but a second bill was introduced and eased through the Senate.

Senate File 132 cleared the House with a 44-14 final vote last week. Gov. Matt Mead signed the bill Monday.

The House later pulled an amendment it included earlier in the week that would have allowed suppressors for hunting predators and small game but would have prohibited them for big-game species.

“Now you can take big game,” said Irah Leonetti, president of the Wyoming Game Wardens Association.

In opposition to the bill, the association said silencers or suppressors could help poachers and would give hunters an unfair advantage over game.

“There is no reason to criminalize the use of these devices for hunting big game,” said Dave Campbell of Powell, who favored the bill.

A game warden can investigate when he or she hears a shot, said Alan Osterland, Wyoming Game and Fish Department wildlife supervisor in Cody.

Landowners can hear shooting and notify the Game and Fish. Most game wardens have worked poaching cases because they or a witness heard a shot, Leonetti said.

A suppressor cannot completely silence gunfire.

A round traveling faster than the speed of sound can’t be suppressed, Campbell said.

But a subsonic round attached to a suppressor and effective at up to 200 yards is very difficult to hear, Leonetti said.

In a YouTube video, the only sound emitted from multiple .300 caliber rounds fired from a semi-automatic was the metallic clack as the rifle ejected spent shells.

Leonetti said he priced suppressors at $1,000 to $2,000, and owning one requires a lot of red tape. The price alone may discourage illicit use, but suppressors could be dangerous in the hands of would be poachers, he said.

Getting a suppressor requires an extensive background check by the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

People testifying before the Legislature argued for suppressors from the standpoint of the Second Amendment. “It’s been a hot topic this legislative session,” Leonetti said.

Campbell said prohibiting suppressors is an archaic restriction.

About 30 states allow suppressors for hunting, and suppressors protect hearing, he said.

“This really isn’t a Second Amendment issue per se,” he said. “In my mind it’s more an administrative/public health issue.”

But Leonetti cited safety concerns about the use of silencers. When a non-suppressed gun is fired, those in the vicinity can hear, it and they can chose to hunt in a different drainage, he said.

The Game and Fish Department must do the Legislature’s bidding.

“Whatever is passed by the Legislature we’ll implement,” said Eric Keszler, Game and Fish public information officer in Cheyenne. “That’s our job.”


  • posted by jon varnum

    February 21, 2013 9:29 am

    I've lived in areas where silencers are considered polite, especialy for areas with lots of city folks. People will call the cops at a drop of a hat if your legal or not.

    I've shot a few thousand rounds through supressed .308 in the military. They are still loud enough you should wear hearing protection. The Youtube video they saw was bogus if all you can hear is the action. To cycle an action on a .300 (I'm guessing .300 blackout) you still have more powder than a large firecracker.

  • posted by Salty Dawg

    February 19, 2013 12:48 pm

    That's funny,most of us hunted for many years without all this crap you people think you need.You people are not hunters anymore,you people are wannabes who think they need a GPS and cell phone to get where they are going,can't read a map and use a compass and generally just want to "keep up with the Jonses".What's next,a rubber band to retrieve lost arrows when archery hunting?

  • posted by Russ Miller

    February 19, 2013 11:25 am

    Youtube video or not, our opinions about so-called silencers are distorted by Hollywood myths where bad guys sneak around with whisper quiet handguns. Real world guns are end of the world loud. Suppressors just take the edge off those cataclysmic bangs. It's not like the sound of a bullet being fired, any bullet, is going to give someone time to duck to safety from that particular shot. As far as any increase in crime or danger, this is a non-issue.

Leave a comment

All comments are initially screened to avoid spam and profanity, and your comment may take some time to appear on the site. The Powell Tribune reserves the right to not publish inappropriate comments.
Fields marked (*) are required.


Get all the latest Powell news by subscribing to the Powell Tribune today!

Click here to find out more!


Our paper can be delivered right to your e-mail inbox with a subscription to the Powell Tribune!

Find out more here!

Stay Connected

Keep up with Powell news by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.

Go to top