Perspectives

When God’s will is good — but not easy

By Bill Harvison
Posted 2/19/26

In a culture that prizes comfort and quick solutions, the idea that something can be both good and deeply difficult feels almost contradictory. Yet for millions of Christians, that tension defines …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

E-mail
Password
Log in
Perspectives

When God’s will is good — but not easy

Posted

In a culture that prizes comfort and quick solutions, the idea that something can be both good and deeply difficult feels almost contradictory. Yet for millions of Christians, that tension defines how they understand God’s will.

“God’s will is always good, but it is not always easy” is more than a comforting phrase. It reflects a belief in divine sovereignty — the conviction that God is in control and working with intention, even when life feels chaotic. That conviction becomes most tested in times of suffering.

Across the globe, headlines chronicle war, natural disasters and acts of violence. Communities grieve losses that feel senseless. Closer to home, many quietly endure job loss, financial instability, chronic illness or sudden diagnoses that alter the course of their lives.

For those in the middle of hardship, it can be nearly impossible to see anything good emerging from it. Yet Christian theology insists that a limited human perspective does not mean the absence of purpose. Trusting in God’s sovereignty offers a different lens — one that suggests pain, while real and often severe, is not random. It is not outside of God’s knowledge or beyond his ability to redeem.

This belief is rooted in the central event of the Christian faith: the suffering of Jesus Christ. In 1 Peter 3:18, the apostle writes, “For Christ also suffered … that He might bring us to God.” According to Christian doctrine, the crucifixion was not a tragic accident but a deliberate act within God’s redemptive plan. Jesus is described as “the righteous for the unrighteous.”

The implication is both theological and personal. Humanity, flawed and sinful, could not reconcile itself to a holy God. Christ, understood to be righteous, suffered in place of the unrighteous to bridge that gap. His death is viewed as the conquest of sin; his resurrection, the defeat of death.

From this perspective, suffering is not inherently meaningless. The most unjust suffering in history — the crucifixion — became the means of salvation. If God could bring redemption from the cross, then present pain may also carry an unseen purpose. That does not minimize grief or simplify loss. Christian teaching does not deny that suffering hurts or that questions linger unanswered. Instead, it calls for trust: the belief that God’s goodness remains intact even when circumstances are not.

The practical question, then, becomes one of response. If Christ suffered to bring humanity to God, how should individuals live in return? Faith, mercy, grace, and hope are often cited as marks of a life aligned with God’s will — especially when that will is difficult. The claim that “God’s will is always good, but not always easy” ultimately rests on the conviction that the story is larger than the moment. Just as resurrection followed crucifixion, believers trust that present trials are not the final chapter.

 

(Bill Harvison is the pastor of Victory Baptist Church in Powell.)

Comments

No comments on this story    Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment