Dear editor:
With family in Powell, Greybull and area, I read news articles urging states to strip some so-called junk-foods or snacks regarded as unhealthy from the $100 billion federal …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
The Powell Tribune has expanded its online content. To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, or purchase a subscription.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free web account by clicking here.
If you already have a web account, but need to reset it, you can do so by clicking here.
If you would like to purchase a subscription click here.
Please log in to continue |
|
Dear editor:
With family in Powell, Greybull and area, I read news articles urging states to strip some so-called junk-foods or snacks regarded as unhealthy from the $100 billion federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which serves 42 million Americans. To be clear, I support banning public food cards being used say for spearmint chewing-gum or sugary Jolly Rancher candies, etc.
However, I have a first-cousin who is a retired pharmacist. He commented to me one day that he likes Gatorade. I commented to him that, if memory serves, both Gatorade and Powerade have about 2% of the daily requirement of potassium, per serving. Yet, where I had the last laugh was in showing him the reverse label of my Lay's potato chips which has 13% allowance of potassium. Plus, those chips have 6% allowance of Vitamin C and a 7% (a good source) of fiber. I do concede it all depends on how foods are processed and fat must be taken into consideration, too.
My Hershey’s pure milk chocolate bar label says it has 6% calcium; 8% of iron; 4% potassium, with 4% dietary fiber.
I fully agree that the back label of a Coca-Cola has zero, zero, zero percent of anything redeeming; with only high rates of sodium and calories. Nobody wants heart disease nor diabetes. RFK has some good ideas, but I still don't want to follow his habit of eating road-kill for any type of dinner!
Where it's blatantly obvious, I think the ban of coverage by SNAP funds is warranted. But, if it is a close-call with a product having a fair amount of vitamins, minerals or fiber, I feel some negotiations and compromise can be made.
James A. Marples
Longview, Texas