Clear, 65° F
Dear editor:
I read with dismay the article regarding Charlie Kirk being a prophet.
Simply put, biblically Charlie was not a prophet, because he did not fulfill the requirements of that …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
The Powell Tribune has expanded its online content. To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, or purchase a subscription.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free web account by clicking here.
If you already have a web account, but need to reset it, you can do so by clicking here.
If you would like to purchase a subscription click here.
Please log in to continue |
|
Dear editor:
I read with dismay the article regarding Charlie Kirk being a prophet.
Simply put, biblically Charlie was not a prophet, because he did not fulfill the requirements of that office. As on the Opinon page in the Oct. 7 paper, Charlie was not “a prophet much like Jesus himself.”
To make such a claim as Scott Weber said borders on blasphemy. I invite Mr. Weber to repent and adjust this for next time.
Litmus tests for a true prophet are delineated in Deuteronomy 18:18, along with how to detect a false prophet. I honestly believe that Charlie Kirk would roll over in his grave at such a title bestowed upon him.
Thank you for listening.
Sincerely,
Tom Young
Cody
