The Douglas City Council last month informally instructed its attorney, Mike Armstrong, to start crafting changes to its controversial public records policy, which currently mandates that the public …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
The Powell Tribune has expanded its online content. To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, or purchase a subscription.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free web account by clicking here.
If you already have a web account, but need to reset it, you can do so by clicking here.
If you would like to purchase a subscription click here.
Please log in to continue |
|
The Douglas City Council last month informally instructed its attorney, Mike Armstrong, to start crafting changes to its controversial public records policy, which currently mandates that the public and press be charged for printed or emailed copies of city documents.
It’s always good to review policies and procedures and look for efficiencies, Mayor Rene Kemper said last week. The issue was not addressed during the council’s official June 28 meeting, but had been expected to be discussed during its work session the prior week.
The city currently charges a minimum $25 per hour research fee for public documents — even for those documents already readily available — based on a 2015 city resolution which had not been enforced until earlier this year. It also charges $1 per page for a fax or copy in black and white, or $1.25 per page for color, and $1 per page for emailed documents to go along with the $25 or higher research fee.
The $25 fee is charged regardless of the time it takes to find the document being requested, but if the city staff has to compile the information, the charge is $25 per hour.
In addition, the city requires anyone requesting a public document complete a form stating the reason for the request, the organization wanting it and more. Douglas Budget Publisher Matt Adelman said that form alone violates the state’s open records law and its intent, which doesn’t allow the governmental entity to ask why the request is being made or for what purpose the information will be used.
Adelman also has repeatedly argued the fees charged by the city for public documents are exorbitant given the nature of most requests by the public and that the vast majority of the documents are already created and are easily accessible by staff, so the minimum “research fee” is unwarranted and simply a way to keep the public from requesting documents it has a right to see and has already paid for with its taxes.
The newspaper publisher, who was not at the council work session, said he was heartened to hear the council wants to revisit the policy and make changes that should make it better for the public to access public documents.
Kemper said that at the June 24 work session, the city council discussed looking at how the state set up its public record fees, which is something the city will consider.
It is the “gold standard” the city will be looking at, she said.