Grizzly mauling lawsuit

Posted

Federal government sued for negligence in ’10 death

A widow has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the federal government after her husband was killed in 2010 by a grizzly bear that was recovering from a research team’s tranquilizers west of Cody.

Yolanda Evert, of Park Ridge, Ill., filled suit in U.S. District Court in Cheyenne on Tuesday, seeking $5 million in damages for the death of her husband, Erwin Frank Evert. She and her husband owned a cabin about one mile from the research site where Evert was killed and had lived there seasonally for nearly 40 years.

The suit alleges the Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team, under the U.S. Geological Survey, negligently removed warning signs near the research site three days early and in violation of federal protocols.

On June 17, 2010, members of the team had captured and placed radio collars on two grizzly bears in the Kitty Creek drainage, about 40 miles west of Cody in the Shoshone National Forest.

The 70-year-old Evert met the second bear the team had caught and released after hiking into the area. The 430-pound male grizzly killed Evert.

“Mr. Evert was unfairly blamed for contributing to his own death,” said Emily Rankin, a partner at the Spence Law Firm in a news release. “Contrary to initial speculation, there were no bear warning signs for Mr. Evert to observe because the IGBST (Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team) personnel negligently removed each and every sign on their way out of the trapping site.”

“Had warning signs been in place, Erwin absolutely would have observed them,” said Yolanda Evert in the Spence news release. “He had safely worked and lived in the Kitty Creek area for decades before this incident. The government could have prevented this tragedy.”

The suit also claims that the study team members failed to notify all but one of the Kitty Creek cabin owners about the trapping in the area.

Erwin Evert had reportedly told his daughter that morning that he was going up the trail to check out what the bear research team was doing, said a 2010 federal report on the incident. Evert had seen “Dangerous Bear” warning signs at the second site (where the female grizzly was captured), but had not been to the site where the male grizzly was captured while trapping was taking place and the warning signs were up.

The signs were removed by interagency study team members as they left the site that afternoon; the Spence release said it was about 30 minutes later that Evert left for his hike.

“This was the final day of this trapping session and we knew we would not be returning for another trapping stint in the Kitty Creek drainage. We also felt that since we had seen no hikers in the drainage since we began our operations on May 26th, and only two horse parties who stayed on the main trail, that we were justified in our actions,” said Seth Thompson, one of the team’s trappers, in a written statement provided to the team investigating the incident last year. “We also felt that the unfavorable weather conditions would curtail human activity that day.”

The team is administered by the U.S. Geological Survey and includes federal and state officials.

Reached on Wednesday, Chris Servheen, grizzly bear coordinator for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, declined to comment on the suit.

Two days after the fatal attack, the grizzly bear was killed from a helicopter by Interagency Team members.

As described in the lawsuit, interagency study team permits say that “Every possible precaution shall be taken to avoid confrontations between bears and the public, including but not limited to closure or signing of the study sites.”

Evert was a botanist. He had published a book that spring called, “Vascular Flora of the Greater Yellowstone Area.”

Comments