Powell, WY


Humidity: 64%

Wind: 4 mph

Collaborators close in on lake trout

Yellowstone Lake cutthroat trout may be increasing ever so slightly, and that is welcome news. But efforts to decimate lake trout must continue with dogged determination, experts say.

According to rough estimates, between 300,000 and 400,000 non-native adult lake trout dwell in Yellowstone Lake. To save cutthroats, the lake must be rid of the intruding lake trout and their spawn.

A new telemetry project is aiding in that effort.  Using telemetry to track lake trout to their spawning beds was the No. 1 recommendation by a scientific panel convened by the Park Service in 2008.

Before lake trout, an estimated 4 million cutthroats lived in the Yellowstone River system. Now the estimate has dwindled down to 10 percent of that, or perhaps as low as 1 or 2 percent, according to a 2012 Save the Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout brochure from Trout Unlimited.

There are a number of theories of explaining lake trout’s uninvited arrival, first noted in 1994, but there is no conclusive evidence supporting any particular hypothesis. To date, approximately 800,000 lake trout have been captured using gill nets since 1995.

Cutthroats are crucial to the Yellowstone ecosystem, providing food for large birds, small mammals and grizzly bears that fish the tributaries in the spring for spawning cutthroats.

At an East Yellowstone chapter of Trout Unlimited meeting in Cody earlier this month, member Dave Sweet provided an update of the telemetry study at Yellowstone Lake. Sweet is chairing the cutthroat preservation campaign for Trout Unlimited.

A telemetry study was launched last year to monitor lake trout movement patterns, particularly leading to spawning beds, Sweet said.

Last summer, 141 hydroacoustic tags were surgically implanted in lake trout bellies. Forty receivers were attached to buoys around the lake to track signals from the tags.

Roughly two-thirds of the tagged fish are males, because they visit multiple spawning beds while females tend to stick to one bed, Sweet said.

With a computer image, Sweet displays a map of Yellowstone Lake. Red dots around the lake indicate receiver locations. At a relatively narrow corridor entering West Thumb, red dots appear in three rows like a naval blockade.

The intent is to install a curtain of receivers to ascertain the lake trouts’ direction of travel, Sweet said.

The transmitters can lead to the beds. If spawning beds are found and the eggs destroyed, the lake trout population can be substantially reduced.

The receivers also can record lake trout locations, thus directing locations for gill nets that snag lake trout by the thousands. The scientific panel also recommended more gill-netting, which the service has done.

On an average day, 11 miles of gill nets were laid last summer by a commercial fishing boat and two boats manned by Park Service employees, Sweet said.

Approximately 220,000 lake trout were caught in 2011. Of those, 103,000 were netted by a commercial fishing boat. Although many of the 220,000 were juvenile fish, it nonetheless took a big bite from the population, Sweet said.

Preliminary data shows a lot of lake trout activity near Wolf Point, which is located roughly at the entrance to West Thumb.

One dot bounces around the map just outside West Thumb, indicating the travels of a male lake trout. Sweet said he believed the trout was a spawner.

“He is on the prowl,” said Unlimited member Duane Anderson, drawing chuckles from his colleagues.

Beneath Yellowstone Lake’s ice, the receivers are still collecting data.

Scientist Jackson Gross of the U.S. Geological Survey is developing ways to destroy eggs. One method, electroshock, was recently tested. Gross still is trying to evaluate its effectiveness, Sweet said.

The amount of data downloaded from the receivers is massive. At a February meeting in Bozeman, Mont., Robert Gresswell, a research biologist at the U.S.G.S., who initiated the telemetry study, said he did not have time to analyze it. Gresswell suggested hiring an individual to analyze the data would cost $100,000, Sweet said.

Yellowstone Park Superintendent Dan Wenk has said he would provide money from a Yellowstone Park Foundation grant.

“That’s the kind of commitment Dan Wenk is making,” Sweet said.

The foundation committed $1 million to help the park launch a comprehensive native fish conservation program, which is based on a service plan approved in 2011. The top priority of the program is to take proactive steps to restore the Yellowstone Lake cutthroats by removing lake trout.

The project to rid Yellowstone Lake of lake trout is a joint effort by the National Park Service, Trout Unlimited, U.S. Geological Survey, Greater Yellowstone Coalition, National Parks Conservation Association and the Yellowstone Park Foundation.

Trout Unlimited donated $40,000 last year to get the project started. This year they are seeking $85,000. A portion of that has been raised, Sweet said.

Yellowstone Park fishing licenses include a postcard asking anglers to report the location, number of fish caught, the species and the amount of time spent fishing. Survey results from thousands of anglers over the years said they caught on average 1.5 to 2 cutthroats per hour on Yellowstone Lake in the 1970s and ’80s. By the early to mid 2000s, anglers were catching 0.5 cutthroats per hour. However in the last two years, anglers were landing 0.7 to 0.8 cutthroats per hour. A small, but heartening cutthroat rebound. “It’s an indication that maybe things are getting a little better in the lake,” Sweet said.


  • posted by B.McRann

    March 28, 2012 9:15 am

    if you don't stock the rivers and lakes the people will stay home for the price of gas. Make something happen for the people that enjoy the outside world and nature.

  • posted by John Williams

    March 22, 2012 7:25 am

    There is so much wrong with this PR for a hopeless program. They talk about the estimated number of adult lake trout without mentioning the huge sub-adult population. They implement a telemetry program with no plan on how to analyze the data? There only measurement of improvement is catch rate when all they would have to do is repair the weir at Clear Creek to compare cutthroat spawners. They don't want to know THAT number.

  • posted by SomethinsFishy

    March 21, 2012 10:55 am

    A noble effort.
    Some random thoughts: Will angler use decline if nothing is done? Will/has the lake gain use because of trophy lake trout fishing? Have the lake trout spawning beds been identified yet? How large are mature females? Only 10% of cutts remain, but cutt catch rates are down only about 50%?? I remember some concern back in time, that the lake was way overpopulated with cutts, and length limits were changed several times to increase harvest and reduce populations. Would cutt/lake trout reach equilibrium at some point, where both would co-exist?
    Catch all them critters, and some bucket biologist will decide they need something else to occupy their perverted mind. OMG then what?? The fishy folks should be commended for their innovation, commitment and efforts.
    They must all be optimists in this endeavor!!

  • posted by Mike Letson

    March 20, 2012 8:14 pm

    I'm impressed with what is being done to try to rejuvinate the Cutthroat population. I have a feeling that if it were left to the Park Service we'd all be sucking hind teet. I hope TU keeps the program going.

  • posted by head_hunter

    March 20, 2012 10:45 am

    trout unlimited never had permission to build the river trail and the stairway system so it got yanked by the stock trail ownership which is the buffalo bill center. being a lacky for the game and fish department hasnt helped the image of trout unlimited, either. i think they are down to something like 7 or 8 members and a couple of wives. but i heard that their next big project is to restore some historical cabin somewhere up in sunlight, that will help the trout dontcha know?.if you 're going to veer way off course then go all the way i guess!

  • posted by Eagle Creek

    March 20, 2012 9:19 am

    It's good to see that the local Trout Unlimited chapter is doing something involving "fish" and "water"...this group has gotten soooo far off target the past few years getting involved with projects that had little to nothing to do with cold water conservation. With the rate of members who have dropped out, an active "member" is alot more scarce then a cutthroat in Yellowstone Lake!

    Wow, take a poll of active fisherman in the area and you'll be hard put to find one that is a member of TU...most got tired of the backroom games and membership voices not being heard.

    Now...what happened to that stairway on the Paul Stock trail???

Leave a comment

All comments are initially screened to avoid spam and profanity, and your comment may take some time to appear on the site. The Powell Tribune reserves the right to not publish inappropriate comments.
Fields marked (*) are required.


Get all the latest Powell news by subscribing to the Powell Tribune today!

Click here to find out more!


Our paper can be delivered right to your e-mail inbox with a subscription to the Powell Tribune!

Find out more here!

Stay Connected

Keep up with Powell news by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.

Go to top