Mostly Cloudy


Powell, WY

Mostly Cloudy

Humidity: 68%

Wind: 11 mph

City extends golf club agreement for three years

Council split 4-3 on decision

The Powell Golf Club will continue to manage the municipal golf course under a three-year extension approved in a 4-3 split vote by the Powell City Council last week.

Amid conversations about lowering rates, the course’s ongoing debt, a better marketing plan and the city’s level of funding, the council voted 5-2 last month to extend the agreement for only three months rather than a full year. Some councilmen alluded to new management for the city-owned course.

Mayor Scott Mangold and councilmen Jim Hillberry and Don Hillman voted against the extension during the Aug. 20 meeting.

With the golf club’s management agreement in limbo, Powell Golf Club leaders said it’s been difficult to sell memberships or raise funds from the community — something city councilmen asked golfers to do.

The extension provides stability for donors who made a commitment for three years, said Councilman John Wetzel.

“If you’re the one writing the check … you’d like to see a little bit of commitment from the city to say, ‘We’re going to let this thing keep going,’” Wetzel said.

The city has approved three-year agreements in the past. Councilmen decided last week to do an annual review to look at fees, debt and other issues. The review will take place each October, beginning this year.

Councilman Hillberry said he favored a one-year agreement to see if the club could increase its marketing and memberships and to see if “the attitude in the community has improved.”

Councilman Myron Heny noted that the agreement is for management of the course and doesn’t make any funding promises.

“We’ll give them what our budget allows for,” Heny said.

Concerned with a downward trend in the city’s general fund reserves, councilmen have grappled with how much money to give the golf course. They also would like to see more Powell residents using the facility, and they worry about public perception.

“The perception in the community is that we are subsidizing the golf course, and that’s why people are talking about rates. I don’t want to micromanage you. I don’t want to tell you who to hire and what your rates need to be,” Councilman Eric Paul said. But in discussions with residents, “they feel we’re spending public money to subsidize the golf course that, in exchange, is keeping the rate too high for a large number of people. I think that’s the origin of this discussion.”

Councilmen have asked for lower rates and an a la carte structure, where golfers could choose between the driving range, a golf cart and greens fees. Currently, the three are lumped together in a daily fee for 18 holes — $35 on Mondays, $49 on Tuesdays-Fridays and $59 on weekends and holidays. Earlier this summer, the golf board set a new rate for Powell golfers who just want to walk. By showing a Powell identification, they can play on Tuesdays, Wednesdays or Thursdays at $25 for nine holes and $35 for 18 holes.

“We would love to lower the prices. The problem is, if you want us to pay for the golf course, that’s where the issue comes in,” said Greg Toland, golf board president.

Toland said memberships and revenue from greens fees are up 12 percent this year.

“It’s not that we haven’t been making money,” he added. “The problem is that we’ve been carrying losses for years.”

Ongoing debt has forced the golf club to borrow from the next year’s membership sales to get through a season. For the first time in years, the golf club won’t have to do that this season, Toland said.

Along with city matching funds, donations helped pay down around $57,000 of the golf course’s debt this year. About $200,000 of debt remains.

If the club lowers rates and loses revenue, Toland asked if the city would then make up the difference.

“One of the biggest complaints I get from people is that they can’t afford to play out there, so maybe that’s not a bad idea,” Councilman Hillman said, suggesting that could take the place of the city’s annual contributions.

Some disagreed.

“I just think that’s a heck of a big ‘if,’” Heny said later. “That scares me.”

Wetzel said if you look at the financial history of the club, lower rates have hurt the course.

Jerry Herweyer, a golf board member, told the council, “in an effort not to upset you, but if you take the aquatic center, and the loss you have there, with the same logic, you ought to lower the rates to increase your revenue.”

Stuart Schwab, a Powell resident, said he believes lower rates would help. He said many Powell golfers go to Lovell, because it’s cheaper.

“I can’t afford a membership — it’s very expensive to golf in Powell,” said Schwab. “I hear what you’re saying, but I think entertaining that idea of lowering some prices so people can afford to golf on weekends or nights — I think you shouldn’t overlook that opportunity.”

Schwab is Councilman Hillman’s son-in-law.

Ed Wenzel of Powell suggested lowering the rates for one Saturday or Sunday a month.

Jan Bailey said Powell’s golf rates are actually lower than a lot of places in the state.

“We’re not the most expensive around,” said Bailey, who lives in Powell.

Toland said the club continues to look for ways to trim its $415,944 operating budget and relies heavily on outside donations of time, money and supplies — including an all-volunteer board. The city’s funding makes up about 15 percent of the golf course’s overall budget.

The golf course’s operating budget is lower than most in the region, including some nine-hole courses, he said.

Mangold called it “a beautiful golf course.”

“We’re trying to do our best to help you guys,” he said. “That’s why we talked about the rates and what we can maybe do differently and increasing the marketing.

“But if things don’t change, as far as our general fund is concerned, there’s not going to be any money. It’s going to be gone. And that’s why we’re concerned up here about what’s going to happen with the golf course, and how we can get more people involved,” Mangold said.

“For a town our size, we’re very fortunate to have (a golf course), but it could be coming to a head next year,” the mayor said. “We may be running into some problems, and there may not be any more money whatsoever.”

He said he realizes some towns give more money to their golf courses, but “a lot of those towns have some supplemental income that we don’t have here.”


  • posted by A Denver Golfer

    September 06, 2012 6:22 pm

    Hopefully enough of the people who CARE about this golf course will be able to get it under control and the city will be out in the SAND DUNES, they wont own it nor be a part of it and that is what I hope happens.

  • posted by Steve Moseley

    September 04, 2012 6:42 pm

    If you're going to constantly brandish the word like a sword, at least learn how to spell it for crying out loud. It's m-a-l-f-e-a-s-a-n-c-e. And while we're at it let's go with the more common...and coincidentally also correct...single-m species of lemon. Sheesh.

  • posted by Disgusted EX taxpayer

    August 29, 2012 10:44 am

    I have a suggestion for all the wannabe cow pasture pool players....if you want this white elephant...then YOU pay for it. And the same goes for all the other idiotic schemes you people never seem to get enough of. The little people are tired of paying for YOUR wants. Clipstein is CORRECT.

  • posted by clipstein

    August 29, 2012 6:23 am

    well you darn right the city does not have the money......Why for one the pool. had a call last night and it is closed again... When are the ones who pushed all the extra's. the friends and relatives in building this lemmon-going to be charged with malfeance including the city manager????then how about a violation of our right of free speech??? such as june 19th 2008 editoral.... the county jail would be full.

  • posted by Doesnt matter

    August 28, 2012 4:59 pm

    Doesn't surprise me at all.

  • posted by clipstein

    August 28, 2012 3:09 pm

    For all the people who are not suppose to have an opinion--Smile, laugh the town is going down and lets hope the sales tax does the same thing........of course how many that avail themselves of the golf course go to billings to shop???

  • posted by KodyKoyote

    August 28, 2012 12:08 pm

    And Powell wants to be a part of the additional 1% sales tax to get more money from the citizenry? If the golf course can't stay out of the sand traps let it revert to what it was originally. Grass, weeds, and sand. Mangold was right on when he stated that there may not be any more money whatsoever. I got news for all the whanters. There isn't anymore money!

Leave a comment

All comments are initially screened to avoid spam and profanity, and your comment may take some time to appear on the site. The Powell Tribune reserves the right to not publish inappropriate comments.
Fields marked (*) are required.


Get all the latest Powell news by subscribing to the Powell Tribune today!

Click here to find out more!


Our paper can be delivered right to your e-mail inbox with a subscription to the Powell Tribune!

Find out more here!

Stay Connected

Keep up with Powell news by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.

Go to top